One key thing to highlight is that the company ethos and work-live/company engagement balance is quite different between Octopus Energy and Octopus Energy Services (the company that handles Octopus’ metering). Octopus energy clearly has a lot more funding and as such there is a significantly higher number of socials, bonuses, incentives and initiatives. There is also a better staff to workload ration in Octopus Energy and better working hours - teams that sit under Octopus Energy are generally less over-worked, have more free time and do not typically have to work evenings or weekends while in Octopus Energy Services the opposite is true. Having worked for both, the difference is quite visible and I wish Octopus would invest in and value both sets of staff equally.
There is no HR team to my knowledge so it can be difficult to find out where to raise issues relating to that, it can sometimes be quite a bit of back and forth between different teams and departments; particularly if you do not want to involve your direct management.
The higher leadership at octopus tend to make big decisions affecting multiple departments and processes without directly consulting and understanding the implications resulting in teams and their direct team leaders having to adjust to changes with little or no pre warning or advice in the resultant changes to processes, workload or reporting line. I understand that this is par for the course for a company that prides itself on change and innovation and of course it does have benefits like giving individual staff the opportunity to influence processes or apply for new positions but I do thing higher leadership could take a more measured approach to large-scale changes and consult affected teams prior to ‘go-live’ of these changes.