- Compensation increases for performance and promotions is very low compared to other strategy firms
- Strategy of IBM GBS for the use of the Strategy practice in business development and services opportunities is poor
- Development opportunities on real strategy related projects are minimal
- Community feel and more localized projects (at least regional to home towns) is very poor
- Incentives for partners to push and develop S&C projects and people is very poor
- Silo'd nature of GBS and the strategy practice itself does not lend to a wide array of opportunities and limits effectiveness with clients
- Lack of quality recognition in forms other than verbal is poor
- All of the above has led to a decline in morale and ability to attract top talent from schools and other firms