employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

World Food Programme

Is this your company?

World Food Programme reviews

4.0

82% would recommend to a friend

(799 total reviews)
avatar

Cindy McCain

61% approve of CEO

55% positive business outlook

World Food Programme has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 799 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The World Food Programme employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit e ONG industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

799 reviews
5.0
Aug 10, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

No discrimination against junior employees - there is a competence-based work culture respecting one's set of skills rather than just seniority. Generally good salaries, though for consultants there seems to be a strict limit on both salaries and overall benefits.

Cons

As a UN organisation, the org structure itself is very old fashioned and bureaucratic. You are expected a lot, while not moving up the ladder quickly enough. If you want the job where you climb up to higher positions quickly, this may not be the place to choose.

2.0
Aug 2, 2024

In decline

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

WFP has a great mission, many smart, dedicated colleagues (especially at the national level) and, generally, pays quite well. Some offices offer flexible working arrangements, but this is entirely dependent on management.

Cons

Management across the organization needs a massive overhaul. I was told early on in my time with WFP that people "fail up" regularly and, wow, it is astonishing how true that is. Many decision makers (P4+) are primarily driven by their rank and the pay, entitlements, and power that comes with it. Not only is there a lack of technical expertise in many high ranking positions, the org fails to prioritize people management skills, both in its recruitment and in building it as a skillset. Competent, motivated lower-level staff are bullied and chased out regularly. For an organization that is meant to be built on humanitarian values, there is a clear hierarchy that discriminates based on contract type and promotes nepotism, leaving some of the most important roles filled by the least competent people. It's surprising donors have only recently cut funding to the org.

3.0
Jul 29, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pays well, gratifying work, international environment, flexible schedule. I was lucky to have a team of great people, but not everyone is so lucky.

Cons

Full of incompetent people who are just in it for the money or status. Extremely frustrating for an organization that is supposed to be built on humanitarian values. Much of the leadership is incompetent and wildly overpaid. The majority of the work is done by short-term staff with unstable contracts. Talent is not well-distributed and hard work is not rewarded.

Viewing 133 - 135 of 799 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,417 World Food Programme reviews submitted anonymously by World Food Programme employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if World Food Programme is right for you.