A company that has lost sight of the value of its employees. - Director Sanofi Employee Review

5.0
Jun 28, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay is good for the immediate area (The Poconos). Not competitive for the Mid-Atlantic Region. Products are important and are valuable to society. Benefits are good but have been deteriorating. Global company

Cons

Management has forgotten its most important resource - its employees. There is no real long term planning. It is just cut the cost of goods. HR is useless and does not support the management or the individual employee. There is a definite Franco-centric focus. There is virtually no opportunity for positions in Europe for North Americans but the door swings very wide for the Europeans coming to North America. The Quality organization in particular has been floundering for several years with no real direction and stability. It is difficult to rely upon them for consistent support and direction. Pathetic raises and bonuses are becoming less reliable which use to offset the pathetic raises. There has been a substantial turnover of staff and many talented people have left. Management and HR are doing nothing to resolve the issue and stop the hemorraging. No real opportunity for advancement if you are North American.

Explore other reviews about Sanofi

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

work life balance, benefits, flexibility

Cons

less competitive salary, less promotion

3.0
Jul 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Extensive and active employee resource groups, strong leadership development opportunities, clear company mission, gig opportunities that support career development, strong employee support through the ombuds office and compliance help line, and stable company portfolio.

Cons

No work-life balance considerations with hybrid work model, contradictions in company mission compared to policies (i.e., target to reduce carbon emissions with employee commuting to office as one of the top 5 causes but yet still requiring employees to commute to office 3 days a week), some office sites are not conducive to in office productivity (not enough privacy or space), compensation package is not competitive for MA pharmaceutical companies, long-term incentives have almost no value once they are vested, health care benefits require employees to jump through hoops to maximize discounts or qualify for coverage of certain medications, and accountability for department leadership to follow the corporate leadership pillars is inconsistent across departments.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All